Prayer
intentions for August
Pope
Benedict's general prayer intention for August is:
'That the human family may know how to respect God's
design for the world and thus become ever more aware
of the great gift of God which Creation represents
for us'.
His
mission intention is: 'That the answer of the entire
people of God to the common vocation to sanctity and
mission may be promoted and fostered, with careful
discernment of the charisms and a constant commitment
to spiritual and cultural formation'.[Vatican Information
Service] 1470.1
A
message for the Olympic Games
Pope
Benedict XVI has sent his greetings to China ahead
of the Olympics, expressing hope that the games would
offer an example of coexistence between people from
different places.
He
expressed hope that sports could be 'a pledge of brotherhood
and peace among people.'
The
pope said he would follow the Olympics with a sense
of deep friendship.
Benedict
spoke Sunday during the traditional Angelus prayer.
He was delivering it from the town of Bressanone,
in the Italian Alps, where he is vacationing. [AP]
1470.2
A
Pauline visit to Syria?
A top Islamic leader has issued an invitation for
Pope Benedict XVI to visit Syria during the current
Pauline year, the Italian Apcom news agency reports.
Sheik
Ahmad Badereddine Hassoun, the grand mufti of Syria,
told reporters that he hoped the Pope would visit
'in the footsteps of St. Paul.' He volunteered to
travel to Rome to help the Pontiff prepare for such
a trip.
The
Vatican acknowledged the invitation without making
any commitment. Father Federico Lombardi, the director
of the Vatican press office, observed that the invitation
was a sign of warm relations between the Holy See
and Syria's Islamic leadership.
The
Syrian grand mufti has not always been so cordial
in his attitude toward Pope Benedict. Following the
Pope's Regensburg lecture, Hassoun said that the text
revealed the Pope's 'ugliness and extremism.'
More
recently, however, Hassoun joined the other Islamic
officials in the 'Common Word' initiative designed
to encourage talks between Catholic and Islamic leaders.
The first session of those talks is now scheduled
to take place in Rome in November. [CWNews] 1470.3
International
AIDS Conference
In
hopes of combating 'ignorance' about the Catholic
Church's response to AIDS, the Catholic charity Caritas
Internationalis will take part in the 27th International
AIDS Conference to be held this August in Mexico City.
At the conference the charity will join 25,000 participants
who include internationally-known experts and decision
makers.
Rev.
Msgr. Robert J. Vitillo, the Special Advisor on HIV
for Caritas Internationalis, will participate in the
conference. Speaking in a press release, Monsignor
Vitillo described the conference as an opportunity
to share as much new knowledge and experience as possible.
He
also said one challenge facing Caritas Internationalis
is the 'ignorance' of the Catholic Church's response
to AIDS.
'We
need to learn better how to let our light shine and
not hide it under a bushel basket,' Monsignor Vitillo
advised.
Recently,
dissenting Catholics published an open letter in a
major U.S. newspaper claiming that Catholic teaching
on contraception is hindering AIDS prevention efforts.
Monsignor
Vitillo noted that Caritas Internationalis has offered
leadership and education about HIV and AIDS for the
past twenty years. Caritas has opposed AIDS-related
stigma and discrimination and promoted access to treatment
for all disease victims, in cooperation with the United
Nations and other organizations, he said.
He
explained that securing funding for Catholic AIDS
relief work is a major challenge because only a small
amount of pledged money goes to religious organizations,
even though they provide a large proportion of care
for people with HIV and AIDS.
The
monsignor said Caritas Internationalis has worked
to obtain more equitable funding.
'Because
of our motivation and roots in Catholic teaching,'
he said, 'Caritas is not just professionally competent,
but we are interested in the whole person and we try
to help each person realize their God-given dignity.
That requires attention to physical, emotional, social
and pastoral needs.'
The
Mexico City conference will last from August 3-8.
On August 5, Caritas Internationalis, Caritas Mexico,
the Catholic HIV/AIDS Network and the Jesuit community
in Mexico will host Catholic organizations' delegates
in an evening of prayer and discussion. [CNA] 1470.4
United Nations

CEDAW
appointments, UNFPA report
The Catholic Family Institute (C-Fam) reports from
New York on the election of new CEDAW members which
took place this week at UN headquarters in New York.
Surprise, surprise: pro-abortion women were elected.
They also report on UNFPA's new annual report which
doesn't mention clean water, a problem affecting billions
of the world's poor, while reproductive health was
mentioned 80 times! UNFPA uses the term reproductive
health as a euphemism for abortion and continues to
deny they support abortion!
CEDAW
Committee Holds Elections; Pro-Abortion Members Re-Elected
Samantha
Singson writes : 'States' parties to the Convention
on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination
against Women (CEDAW) convened at United Nations headquarters
in New York this week to elect new members to the
23-member CEDAW Committee. Nineteen nominees vied
for eleven vacancies. In a secret ballot, private
citizens from Cuba, India, France, Finland, China,
Brazil, Romania, Jamaica, Kenya, Spain and Afghanistan
were selected to fill the slots.
The CEDAW committee is charged with monitoring governments
on their compliance with the treaty. According to
the convention, committee members are elected by States'
Parties from among their nationals, but serve in their
personal capacity. Members of the committee should
be 'independent' and 'of high moral standing and competence.'
CEDAW critics have become increasingly concerned about
the work and composition of the committee. The committee
has taken it upon itself to question nations on their
abortion laws, even though the abortion is not mentioned
in the treaty. The CEDAW Committee created their own
'general recommendation' that reads abortion into
the text, and in recent years CEDAW committee members
have pressured more than 60 nations on their abortion
legislation.
Prior to this week's election, a survey of the committee
revealed that half of the CEDAW committee members
are direct employees of such radical non-governmental
organizations as the Latin America and Caribbean Committee
for the Defense of Women's Rights, the International
Council of Women, the Global Fund for Women and the
and the International Women's Rights Action Watch
(IWRAW).
Radical feminists also ran campaigns to get their
colleagues elected to the committee.
The International Gay and Lesbian Human Rights Commission
(IGLHRC) urged its members to help reelect some of
the CEDAW Committee's most outspoken pro-abortion
members, Silvia Pimentel of Brazil and Malaysia's
Maria Shanthi Dairiam. IGLHRC's action alert stated,
'There is some concern that conservative states might
do their best to ensure that partial experts are elected
to the Committee because they do not want the CEDAW
Committee to be too progressive, particularly regarding
issues around culture, religion and reproductive and
sexual rights.'
While Shanthi Dairiam was denied another term on the
committee, Silvia Pimentel will continue on for another
four years. During the last CEDAW committee session
alone, Pimentel questioned a number of states on the
abortion laws, pushed wider access to contraception,
pressed Finland on 'women of sexual minorities' access
to health services,' took issue with Slovakia's concordat
with the Holy See that protects the right of health
care workers to conscientiously object to taking part
in abortions, and complained that heterosexual marriage
perpetuated the stereotype of women as childbearers.
The CEDAW Committee will next meet again in Geneva
in October to review the reports from Bahrain, Belgium,
Cameroon, Canada, Ecuador, El Salvador, Kyrgyzstan,
Madagascar, Mongolia, Myanmar, Portugal, Slovenia
and Uruguay.
The new members will fill the vacancies that expire
in December and they will serve a four-year term beginning
January 2009. Other members on the CEDAW Committee
include individuals from Bangladesh, Algeria, Thailand,
Ghana, Netherlands, Egypt, Israel, Slovenia, Mauritius,
Japan and Croatia.
UNFPA's Annual Report Focuses Almost Exclusively
on 'Reproductive Health'
Stephen
Braunlich writes : 'The United Nations Population
Fund (UNFPA) recently released its annual report for
2007, touting principally the organization's work
in the field of 'sexual and reproductive health.'
The radical nature of the document is revealed in
the number of times certain issues are mentioned.
In a 36 page document 'reproductive health' or 'reproductive
rights', which are used as euphemisms for abortion,
are mentioned 80 times. Widespread killers like malaria
and tuberculosis do not receive any mention at all.
Clean water, clearly one of the chief problems of
the world's poor, does not receive a mention and safe
sanitation, the lack of which is a leading killer
in the developing world, received one mention.
The annual report reveals that in 2007, over half
of UNFPA's program expenses went to reproductive health
programs, at a cost of $146.6 million. Region by region,
more funds were spent on reproductive health initiatives
than any other program. Though UNFPA refuses to release
detailed accounting of its programs and the annual
report lacks the detailed financial accounting commonplace
in annual corporate filings, it provides anecdotes
of agency expenditures.
Examples of last year's UNFPA initiatives include
developing 'guidelines and protocols for reproductive
health services' in the former Soviet Republic of
Georgia. One needs to look elsewhere for specifics
about on-the-ground practices, however. UNFPA press
releases report that mobile reproductive health teams
in Georgia distribute contraceptive devices, including
intrauterine device (IUD) insertion kits. IUDs can
cause abortions by changing the lining of the uterus
to prevent a fertilized egg from implanting. UNFPA
consistently denies they support abortion in any way.
The report also reveals techniques used to promote
UNFPA's agenda among minors. UNFPA collaborated with
the Lebanese government to create lebteen.com, a site
that encourages teenage use of the 'morning-after-pill.'
Though promoted as 'emergency contraceptives,' the
pills can function as abortifacients by causing the
expulsion of fertilized eggs.
Among the more significant initiatives downplayed
in the report is UNFPA's new 'strategic 'master plan.''
It receives only passing reference though it will
guide the agency through 2011.
One of the plan's major goals is universal access
to reproductive health by 2015 through promotion of
'reproductive rights' - a term defined on UNFPA's
website as encompassing a right to privacy, which
is commonly understood as a euphemism for abortion.
The plan also focuses on mental health as an 'integral
aspect of reproductive health.' In the United States
and elsewhere 'mental health' has been used radically
to expand abortion rights beyond cases where a mother's
physical well-being is at issue. Indicators that UNFPA
will use to gauge success toward meeting this goal
include increasing the number of countries that provide
public funding for reproductive health services and
the prevalence of contraceptive usage.
A second master plan goal is for women and adolescent
girls to exercise 'reproductive rights.' This objective
includes using human rights systems to expand 'reproductive
rights' and integrate these rights into national policies.
Measures of successful implementation include enlarging
the number of countries that enshrine 'reproductive
rights' among the fundamental human rights recognized
by their courts, and an increase in the number of
laws incorporating such rights.
The United States under the Bush administration has
withheld funding from UNFPA because of its complicity
in China's forced abortion and sterilization programs.
[C-FAM] 1470.5
'Lots
of condoms, lots of drugs'
In
its 2008 report, released on Tuesday, UNAIDS, the
UN body responsible for preventing and treating HIV/AIDS
globally, presents the results of years of research,
on-the-ground experience and hundreds of millions
of dollars in funding.
And
so, you ask, what are the intricate details of UNAIDS'
carefully thought-out and heavily researched multi-phase
program to respond to the AIDS epidemic? First phase:
condoms. Lots and lots of condoms. Heaps of condoms.
Bajillions of condoms. Condoms for every man, woman,
and child.
Second
phase: in the eventuality that the condoms break,
fail or aren't used every single time (as, statistics
show, they usually aren't), UNAIDS is prepared with
drugs.
Lots of drugs. Lots and lots of expensive drugs. And
what miracles of modern science can these drugs accomplish?
They can postpone the inevitable lingering death of
the infected (for some additional 4-12 years anyway).
A
great accomplishment, this plan of theirs.
A
search of the 362 page 2008 UNAIDS report shows 149
uses of the word 'condom.' And each time condoms are
mentioned, they are presented as being the weight-bearing
pillar in any successful AIDS-prevention strategy.
Education, of course, is also frequently mentioned
as being very, very important. But education seems
to primarily consist of teaching Africans how, when
(always), and where (everywhere) to use a condom.
On
the other hand, a search of the word 'abstinence'
results in six hits. One of those references is in
the bibliography. Two of the others are found in the
chapter on AIDS-prevention and are there only to be
ridiculed. Abstinence programs are bad because they
discourage 'forthright discussions about condoms and
safer sex.' And anyway, 'studies show' that 'programmes
that exclusively promote abstinence do not reduce
the risk of HIV infection.'
The
other three mentions of abstinence are all passing
remarks about how in some backward cultures women
don't have jobs and aren't therefore 'empowered' to
demand abstinence from their husbands. But as we aren't
told why abstinence is a good thing in the first place,
the significance of this point is unclear.
Finally,
in the entire 362 page document the word 'fidelity'
is mentioned once, and again, it's only to point out
how women don't have independent economic means and
therefore don't have the leverage to demand fidelity
from their husbands because their husbands might leave
them, without any means of support, if they do demand
it.
Now,
let's just stop and think about that for a moment.
I don't care how extreme your agenda is, it seems
pretty obvious that having sex with one person who
is also your life's companion (a pretty common event
until recent decades) who isn't infected, will ultimately
lead to an infection rate of
well, 0%. Zero percent,
to spell things out, is very, very low. It's a lot
lower than, well, anything else. In fact, if the whole
world had a 0% AIDS infection rate, there wouldn't
be any AIDS. But then UNAIDS officials would be out
of a job, the AIDS drug companies would have no sales,
the condom manufacturers would be selling vastly fewer
condoms, and who would want that?
If
I didn't know better (which I'm not sure that I do)
I'd think that everybody at the UN thinks that Africans
are nothing but a bunch of wild beasts driven by blind
instinct. This newest UNAIDS report basically comes
right out and says that if an African feels the urge
to have sex, be it with a young, barely pubescent
girl, or with multiple partners, or with someone known
to be HIV positive, then an African will have sex.
The most we can ever hope to do is to interrupt their
foreplay long enough to get them to put a condom on.
What's
that? You think I exaggerate?
Consider
this. In what can only be interpreted as a spit in
the eye of Uganda, the UNAIDS report includes this
line, breathtaking in its sheer, bitter effrontery:
'In Uganda, the African country that has been most
successful in lowering HIV prevalence, surveys have
documented an increase in risky sexual behaviours
in recent years.'
This
proves, says the report, that people just can't be
expected to significantly change their risky sexual
behaviours, as 'they frequently fail to sustain safer
behaviours for longer periods.' Uganda they smugly
cite as a case in point: You can't expect Africans
to change. The dog returns to its vomit.
Uganda,
if you recall, was one of the few African countries
that massively reduced its HIV/AIDS infection rate
from 21% in 1991, to 6% in 2002. Uganda was Africa's
success story. And it claimed this position entirely
by pioneering the ABC program, which puts heavy emphasis
on A (Abstinence) and B (Be faithful), with C (Condom
use) presented as a last resort. And it worked, for
what I should think are very obvious reasons.
But,
as the co-chair of Uganda's AIDS-Prevention Committee,
Sam Ruteikara, wrote recently in the Washington Post,
it was at the height of his country's AIDS-prevention
success that Western 'advisors' stepped in, told Uganda
they 'had it all wrong' and systematically hijacked
the Committee's documents.
'Repeatedly,'
laments Ruteikara, 'our 25-member prevention committee
put faithfulness and abstinence into the National
Strategic Plan
Repeatedly, foreign advisers erased
our recommendations. When the document draft was published,
fidelity and abstinence were missing.' The Western
'experts, had the financial power to force their casual-sex
agendas upon us.'
Now
AIDS rates in Uganda are climbing once again. And
UNAIDS has only itself to thank.
But
these Western 'experts' will not, of course, admit
their error. They abide by the rule of the oligarch:
'Heads I win, tails you lose.' Whatever way the coin
drops, its bad for the other guy. Ruteikara relates:
'Western media have been told this renewed surge of
HIV infection is because there are 'not enough condoms
in Uganda,' even though we have many more condoms
now than we did in the early 1990s, when our HIV rates
began to decline.'
In
the end the UN's AIDS-prevention strategy amounts
to nothing more than a global game of Russian roulette.
Throwing your arms up and telling people that they'll
never change their risky sexual lifestyles, and then
going on to give them nothing but a razor-thin layer
of porous latex as a barrier between life and a slow,
lingering death, is in effect to hand them a loaded
gun.
In
this case the only difference between the UN and the
mob is that the UN has provided a first-aid kit (heaps
of expensive anti-retroviral drugs) to patch up the
victims they helped to create, who find they have
pulled the trigger on a loaded chamber.
Indeed,
as Sam Ruteikara observes, a great deal of the AIDS-prevention
and treatment 'relief' effort has become nothing more
than a very profitable industry. If I had absolutely
no morals whatsoever, I'd be kicking myself for not
having invested in condoms and anti-retroviral drugs
years ago. Groups like UNAIDS are buying up condoms
in the hundreds of millions and, (sometimes quite
literally) dumping them all over the African continent
with open-handed liberality. And when those condoms
fail, the drug companies step in with their product.
(Now, I should clarify that obviously anti-retroviral
drugs are one of the best things ever to happen to
AIDS sufferers. But when these drugs are treated as
an answer, and not as an unfortunately necessary companion
to rigorous AIDS-prevention strategies based upon
abstinence and fidelity, then they become an enemy
of the effort to eradicate AIDS.).
Take
Namibia, for instance. UNAIDS expresses its pleasure
in its report that in Namibia 25 million condoms are
distributed annually by the government - or, as the
report puts it, 'equivalent to seven condoms per male
aged 15-49.' Twenty-five million. Every year. The
UN announces with great pride that this brilliant
plan, together with widespread HIV testing and education,
'appears' to have 'stabilized' adult HIV rates in
the country. Appears. Stabilized. Wow. There was a
dream that was Uganda, and in that dream AIDS did
not 'appear' to be 'stabilized,' but was actually
being eradicated.
I
conclude with one of the most powerful lines I have
seen written on the question of AIDS-prevention. It
is by Sam Ruteikara. 'Hear my plea, HIV-AIDS profiteers,'
he begs. 'Let my people go. We understand that casual
sex is dear to you, but staying alive is dear to us.
Listen to African wisdom, and we will show you how
to prevent AIDS.' Indeed. [LifeSiteNews] 1470.6
Europe

Irish
abortion laws
An
Irish lawyer predicts that the European Court of Human
Rights will find fault with his country's abortion
law when it considers a case brought by three anonymous
women. Dr Adam McAuley of Dublin City University points
out that the court has ruled that a mother's right
to life and health over-rides her unborn child's rights.
The court had found that the application of Polish
law was improper in the case of a woman whose sight
was affected by pregnancy. Dr McAuley says the women
will win in the forthcoming case because Ireland's
law is stricter than Poland's. He calls for Irish
legislation which specifies the circumstances in which
women may seek an abortion. Liam Gibson of SPUC Northern
Ireland said: 'It is questionable whether the case
of the three women known as A, B and C will even be
heard by the European Court of Human Rights.
Two
years ago the Court refused to hear a very similar
case brought by another Irish woman claiming the same
violations of her rights, because that case had not
been considered by the domestic courts. However, even
if the ABC cases were to reach the European court,
it is very unlikely that it will find any discrimination
has taken place. Irish abortion law is not open to
arbitrary interpretation nor can it be applied in
a way which discriminates against some women. The
verdict in case of Tysiac v Poland therefore does
not mean that the court will force Ireland to legalise
abortion. It is also highly unlikely that any of the
women will be able to show that she had been subject
to inhuman or degrading treatment simply because abortion
is strictly prohibited in Ireland.' [Irish Times,
SPUC] 1470.7
The radical onslaught

SHAME!
Offensive
Planned Parenthood website
1470.8
~ A new web site produced by the Columbia/Williamette,
Oregon Planned Parenthood affiliate features videos
in which a middle-aged man 'dressed something like
Mr. Rogers' advises teens in the middle of suggested
sex acts about sexually transmitted diseases. The
site, which also presents songs with obscene lyrics,
has been criticized for providing erroneous information,
sexualizing young people, targeting very young 'tweens,'
and undermining the sanctity of sex.
The
videos on the Columbia/Williamette Planned Parenthood's
web site 'TakeCareDownThere.org,' variously show two
teenage boys purportedly engaged in a deviant sex
act, advise two other teens how to be tested for disease
after intercourse and instruct how to use condoms.
One of its videos features a song with a long list
of slang terms for male and female genitalia set to
music.
Wendy
Wright, president of Concerned Women for America,
told Cybercast News Service that in one video the
middle-aged man appears as a teenage boy and girl
embrace and kiss.
'Guys,
guys, it looks like it's getting a little hot and
heavy in here,' he says to them. 'Before we take this
to the next level we want to make sure that you know
how to use a condom.'
Wright
said that Planned Parenthood has developed a reputation
for controversy with another of its websites, teenwire.com.
Marie
Hahnenberg, a researcher with the American Life League,
said 'TakeCareDownThere.org' was another example of
Planned Parenthood activities that 'attempt to sexualize
our young people.'
'It
seems to make fun of sex, making it as some kind of
game, as Planned Parenthood claims, when sex is something
so sacred that it should only be between a married
man and woman,' she stated.
Liz
Delapoer, marketing director at the Columbia/Williamette
Planned Parenthood, told Cybercast News Service that
the new site was meant to be 'fun' and 'playful' and
was designed to discuss with 'the younger demographic'
the topic of sexually transmitted diseases.
'We
wanted to empower people to really take care of their
own reproductive and sexual health,' Delapoer commented.
'Through the Web site and the videos, we wanted to
speak in a language that would be non-threatening
to a younger demographic.
Katie
Collins, a journalism scholar with the Clare Booth
Luce Policy Institute, said the site seems to be aimed
at 'tweens' or even younger demographics.
'This
Web site was especially repulsive to me because it
appeals first to very young teenagers, and contains
scientifically inaccurate information but also because
it denigrates sexual intimacy,' Collins explained.
She
said one skit presents the human papillomavirus (HPV),
which is a major cause of cervical cancer in women,
as something that can be combated by regular testing.
'For
men especially, regular testing does not show threat
information on human papillomavirus (HPV) or herpes,'
she argued. [CNA] 1470.8
International news

Austria March
for the unborn
Last
week hundreds of Austrian pro-lifers held the first
annual '1000 Crosses Funeral March' for the unborn.
March
participants met at the Cathedral Square in Salzburg
where they were given a large white cross before setting
out to begin their peaceful procession through the
city. When march participants reached the city's State
Bridge, dozens of roses were thrown into the river
in memory of lives lost to abortion in Austria. At
the end of the march, participants joined together
to celebrate a special 'Mass of Atonement' for those
who promote the scourge of abortion.
This
pro-life march follows several accounts of aggressive
intimidation tactics earlier this year in Vienna by
hired 'escorts' who are employed by abortion mills
to keep pro-lifers from influencing their clientele
- by whatever means necessary.
On
numerous occasions, video cameras outside of Vienna
abortion mills have captured instances of verbal,
sexual and psychological abuse on the part of these
hired antagonists, without any legal repercussions
or police interference. Moreover, the Austrian Parliament
is considering legislation to ban all pro-life activists
from the public property outside abortion clinics,
even if they are only praying silently. [LifeSiteNews]
1470.9
Brazil Leonardo
Boff praises President-elect
The
controversial ex-priest and leader of Marxist liberation
theology, Leonardo Boff of Brazil, said this week
that the former bishop and President-elect of Paraguay
'fully identifies with liberation theology and plans
to implement it in his government, the preferential
option for the poor.'
Boff
made his comments after a meeting with Lugo, according
to the Paraguayan daily 'Ultima Hora.' He said
it was also 'important that policies be adopted to
make citizens aware of the importance of conservation
in order to protect the environment' and that he met
with Lugo 'as an environmentalist seeking support
for regional environmental projects.'
On
July 28, Lugo attended a talk by Boff on education
in environmental issues at the National University
of Asuncion in the city of San Lorenzo.
'Boff's
teaching not in keeping with Catholic Church'
Bishop
Rogelio Livieres Plano of Ciudad del Este spoke with
the Paraguayan daily La Nacion about Boff's views:
'It's not that liberation theology opts for the poor,
as if the Catholic Church did not opt for the poor.
Their manner of opting for the poor is exclusionary.
For this reason John Paul II said the option for the
poor is not exclusive or exclusionary, and he was
referring to liberation theology.'
Bishop
Livieres explained that Boff 'is free to go where
he pleases, I don't agree at all with his theological
opinions. He was condemned by the Holy See in 1985
and he left the Church in 1992. I would ask him not
to go to the Catholic University because that is where
the teaching of the Catholic Church is imparted and
Boff's teaching is not that of the Catholic Church.'
Commenting
on the relationship between Lugo and Boff and the
eventual application of Marxist liberation theology
in Paraguay, Bishop Livieres said the two 'have a
relationship that goes back years. Liberation theology
is an internal problem of the Church; it is not a
guerrilla movement. It is a mistaken way of understanding
the priesthood and all theology. Lugo has fallen into
this error for many years, but it is not a political
error; it is a doctrinal one,' he said.
The
bishop also denied suggestions that there would be
friction between the Church and the incoming government
in Paraguay, as long as Fernando Lugo 'does not meddle
in Church affairs or the Church in State affairs.'
[CNA] 1470.10
Costa
Rica Same-sex
'marriage' protest
Over
20,000 people gathered in the streets of San Jose
last Saturday to voice their opposition to a legislative
proposal that, if passed, will legalize same-sex 'marriage'
in Costa Rica.
Despite
heavy pressure from homosexual activists, Costa Rican
courts ruled homosexual 'marriage' unconstitutional
in 2006; but the issue is now being re-examined by
the legislative assembly.
'We're
calling out against the law that the Legislative Assembly
is considering, to allow for homosexual civil unions,'
said march participant Reynaldo Salazar, according
to CostaRicapages.com.
Earlier
this month, the Bishop's conference of Costa Rica
addressed a letter to the country's law-makers explaining
that 'laws favourable to homosexual unions are contrary
to correct reasoning because they confer legal guarantees
proper to the institution of marriage to unions between
people of the same sex. Considering the values in
question, the State cannot legalize these unions without
failing in its duty to promote and protect an essential
institution for the common good, which marriage is.'
Though
three-quarters of Costa Ricans are Roman Catholic,
Catholics are not alone in expressing their concern
over the matter, as last week's march was organized
by the Costa Rican Evangelical Alliance.
In
a 2006 poll by Universidad Costa Rica, it was revealed
that 71.4 percent of the respondents were against
the legalization of same-sex 'marriage.'
The
bishops said that in changing the marital laws to
favour same-sex 'marriage,' the government would be
making changes that are 'contrary to the common good
of the entire social order.' The bishops also called
on Catholic lawmakers to 'speak out and vote against
this measure, and to those who do not share our faith,
to examine the arguments we have laid out. And in
conformity with the rules of correct reasoning, of
human nature and of life in society, not to cast their
vote for a bill that clearly goes against the common
good of the residents of our country.' [LifeSiteNews]
1470.11
India Population
control
The
Law Reforms Commission of Kerala, India, which is
a government commission, has proposed a law that would
penalize any family that has a third child. The Catholic
Church in India has spoken out against this proposal,
which it says reflects the ideologies of the 'Marxist'
government currently in power in Kerala.
According
to AsiaNews, if enacted, the law will fine any family
that has a third child the equivalent of 150 Euros,
as well as exclude the family from free health care
and education.
The
law ensures that no one's religion or race will grant
them an exception and gives 'any person or a public
organization or institution associated with or carrying
on the work of family planning and birth control'
the right to take an offender of the law to court.
Cardinal
Varkery Vithayathil, president of the Indian Catholic
bishops' conference, told AsiaNews that the 'the Catholic
Church will oppose to the end' the 'state dictatorship
of the Marxist government' of Kerala.
'In
Kerala, there are two different ideologies, the ideology
of supremacy of the state, and the other ideology
being freedom, respect, and the dignity of the human
person,' said the Cardinal.
'Who
has the right to decide the number of children? Human
beings are born for the world, and the Indian government
has tried before and this was opposed by everyone;
even the poorest person knows intrinsically that a
child is a gift of God. The government is proposing
such draconian measures to limit the number of children
for demographic reasons.'
Cardinal
Vithayathil concluded by reflecting on the 40th anniversary
of Humane Vitae, proclaiming the need to defend the
right to life:
'We
want to promote and encourage a pro-life policy, as
we are celebrating 40 years of the encyclical Humane
Vitae. We need to reaffirm the importance of life
in the face of such a proposed law. No legislation
can stop or even hinder the faithful from being generous
in having more children and open to life.' [LifeSiteNews]
1470.12
India Abstinence
The
National AIDS Control Organization-- India's federal
HIV/AIDS monitoring agency-- has unveiled a new AIDS-awareness
curriculum that will focus on abstinence instead of
condoms and 'safe sex' strategies.
'There
will be no mention of condom or safe sex in the revised
module on life-skill education program,' Sujatha Rao,
NACO director-general, said on Tuesday while releasing
the new program, which is being circulated for feedback
from all partners including government officials,
parents, and teachers.
The
new curriculum for spreading awareness on HIV/AIDS
among school students and youth comes after sex-education
manuals in several states-- drafted by the state AIDS-control
societies-- were widely criticized as encouraging
promiscuity among young people by advocating condom
as a safeguard against AIDS prevention.
India
has one of the world's highest number of HIV/AIDS
infections with an estimated 3 million cases. [CWNews]
1470.13
Spain 94.5%
of Down's syndrome babies aborted
The
National Association for the Defence of the Right
to Conscientious Objection is deploring new data this
week that indicates that 9 out every 10 babies diagnosed
with Down's syndrome are aborted by their parents
in Spain.
General
coordinator of the Association, Jose Antonio Diez,
said that in 94.5% of the cases that a prenatal diagnosis
indicates the presence of Down's syndrome, the baby
is aborted.
He
said such diagnoses are often used to 'eliminate children
with more or less serious defects. The doctor is not
free to offer alternatives,' and for this reason many
parents are now conscientiously objecting to prenatal
diagnosis that is not intended for medical treatment,
Diez said.
Spanish
law does not permit abortion in cases in which the
fetus is presumed to have 'serious physical or mental
defects,' such as Trisomy 21, spina bifida or anencephaly.
According
to the 'Women's Help Line Foundation' (Linea de Atencion
a la Mujer), allowing the abortion of handicapped
persons is discrimination 'incompatible with the Convention
on the rights of handicapped persons approved by the
UN in New York on December 13, 2006. Spain signed
that Convention on December 3, 2007, and it took effect
on May 3.'
Article
10 of the Convention affirms that 'the signatory States
reaffirm the inherent right to life of all human beings
and shall adopt all necessary measures to guarantee
the effective enjoyment of that right by handicapped
persons equal to all others.' [CNA] 1470.14
Turkey
'No
alternative to democracy'
'There
are no alternatives to democracy,' said the apostolic
vicar in Anatolia, the day after Turkey's deadliest
terrorist attack in five years killed 17 people.
Bishop
Luigi Padovese, president of the Turkish episcopal
conference, spoke with L'Osservatore Romano
on Monday, expressing his apprehension as Turkey awaited
a decision from the Constitutional Court about whether
to ban the ruling party, accused of trying to move
the nation away from its secular status toward an
Islamic state.
Wednesday,
the court decided not to ban the party, but withdrew
several million dollars worth of state aid.
Speaking
before the court had made a decision, the bishop contended:
'The purpose of the bombs is obvious: to destabilize
a situation that is already quite unsettled. Clearly,
this is the way to interpret such an incident a day
before the decision.'
Sunday's
attack in Istanbul killed 17 people when two bombs
exploded.
Bishop
Padovese lamented that an appeal from the Church --
in a nation where Christians and Jews combined are
only 0.2% of the population -- will not be clearly
heard.
'The
appeal we can launch is of little value, as we are
not such a representative reality,' he said. 'Nevertheless,
the appeal is made to enable democracy to prevail
in this country.'
According
to Bishop Padovese, the problems that exist 'are linked
to positions of power. There is a need to safeguard
secularism and at the same time the right to give
this secularism a democratic expression. Democracy
always represents risks, but there are no alternatives
to democracy.
'The
situation in Turkey has remained in this immobility
until now precisely because of the opposition between
the forces of power. It is a bit like pulling a rope
in which neither party is able to prevail, so things
remain stuck in the middle.' [Zenit] 1470.15
Uganda 'Miss
HIV'
At the premiere of the soon-to-be-released documentary
'Miss HIV' in Kampala, the wife of Uganda's president,
Janet Museveni, lamented the rise in dangerous sexual
behaviour in the country and the resultant rise in
HIV-AIDS rates.
According
to New Vision, Musevini said that Ugandans
are abandoning behaviour-based solutions to HIV-AIDS
in favour of methods, imported from the West, that
only serve to perpetuate the disease.
'It
is not too late to reverse the trend,' she said. 'We
can adopt our own indigenous solutions, which are
less expensive and are 100% sure of preventing the
spread of this deadly disease. I find it very baffling
how we could throw away what worked, and embrace ideas
from elsewhere. Then we watched as rates of infection
soared again to claim lives.'
Musevini's
words echoed those of anti-AIDS crusader Sam Ruteikara,
who wrote in the Washington Post several weeks ago
that Western methods of combating AIDS, which strive
to protect casual sex at all costs, are being imported
into Uganda and are resulting in a rise in risky sexual
behaviour and the overall HIV-AIDS rate.
Ruteikara
lamented that the West's encouragement of dangerous
behaviours leads to an increase in the need for expensive
anti-retroviral drugs. Foreign aid money, he said,
could be better spent on successful AIDS-prevention
strategies. 'For every African who gains access to
HIV treatment, six become newly infected,' he said.
'To treat one AIDS patient with life-prolonging anti-retroviral
drugs costs more than $1,000 a year. Our successful
ABC campaign cost just 29 cents per person each year.'
The
ABC program heavily emphasizes abstinence and fidelity
as a sure means to AIDS-prevention, and promotes condoms
only as a distant last resort. Under the ABC program
Uganda successfully reduced its HIV-AIDS rate from
21% to 6%.
However,
at the same time as Uganda's first lady has draw attention
to the recent increase in HIV-AIDS due to dangerous
sexual practices, a prominent Western activist has
demanded that foreign aid should be withdrawn from
the country on account of its 'homophobia.'
On
Friday July 18, Peter Tatchell, the well-known founder
of the pro-homosexual organization Outrage!, called
for an end to US aid for, 'viciously homophobic countries
like Jamaica, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Uganda, Iraq
and Nigeria.'
'Tyrannies
should not be rewarded: No US aid for anti-gay regimes,'
he said.
Earlier
this month Tatchell, along with Ugandan homosexualist
activist, Kizza Musinguzi, protested a meeting of
traditional Anglicans in London, over their stance
in favour of traditional Christian sexual morality.
The two activists singled out the Ugandan church for
its efforts to curb homosexual activity.
The
Anglican Church in Uganda, including such well-known
anti-AIDS figures as Pastor Martin Ssempa and Rev.
Sam Ruteikara, strongly oppose homosexuality. As part
of its AIDS-prevention activism the Church has long
worked to discourage dangerous homosexual sex.
Statistics
show that the HIV-AIDS infection rate is by far the
highest amongst homosexual men. The most recent UNAIDS
report reveals that in the Kenyan port city of Mombasa,
a incredible 43% of men who only have sex with men
were infected with HIV. The numbers were similarly
high in Zambia, where 1 in 3 men who only have sex
with men were found to have HIV. A 2006 report from
the Public Health Agency of Canada revealed that this
trend is not only isolated to developing nations,
with 51% of Canadians infected with HIV found to be
homosexual men.
According
to New Vision, earlier this month Uganda's
president, Yoweri Museveni, expressed his disagreement
with homosexual behaviour. Marriage, Museveni said
at a betrothal ceremony, is meant for the continuation
of the human race. [LifeSiteNews] 1470.16
UK Uganda
prelate accuses Dr. Rowan Williams
An
Anglican prelate from Africa has accused the Archbishop
of Canterbury of betraying fundamental Christian principles,
and questioned why the leader of the Anglican communion
is chosen by the British government.
In
a provocative essay that appeared in the London Times.
Archbishop Henry Orombi of Uganda said that the Archbishop
of Canterbury, Dr. Rowan Williams, was guilty of 'deep
betrayal' because he opened the Lambeth Conference
to prelates who had shown their contempt for Christian
moral teachings. Archbishop Orombi said that the Anglican
leader should not have invited bishops of the Episcopal
Church in the US, 'in the face of the unrelenting
commitment of the American church to bless sinful
behaviour.'
Archbishop
Orombi was repeating arguments that have been raised
frequently by Africa's more conservative Anglican
leaders, who have objected strenuously to the willingness
of the Episcopal Church to bless homosexual unions.
However, the Ugandan prelate raised a new issue by
questioning the way the Archbishop of Canterbury is
chosen.
The
selection process that produces the worldwide leader
of the Anglican communion is 'a remnant of British
colonialism, and it is not serving us well,' the African
archbishop said. 'Even the Pope is elected by his
peers, but what Anglicans have is a man appointed
by a secular government.' [CWNews] 1470.17